My primary care doctor when I went in for a checkup, was not yet embraced ePrescribing, or begun with an electronic medical records (EHR). I believe that the medical organization that he is a part of has not yet rolled out these capabilities yet, however, they were planning to roll them out. It is my hope that by the time I see him , I will see him connected to the health records that are electronically stored the medical group is currently adopting. While he might not be thrilled about being forced to adjust to this new method of working, I’ll be content because it adds an additional layer of security for me as the patient. For instance, the risk of the miscommunication between my physician and my pharmacist will be significantly reduced. As an expert in quality and productivity I am aware that there are many advantages for his practice. According to what it was stated by the American Medical Association has shown in a white paper, my physician might not spend more time preparing prescriptions however, his staff will surely. Overall, there is an increase in efficiency and security in the workplace.
When I look at this instance of the technology’s adoption within my physician’s office I am aware of the challenges the office is facing, and many of them are typical to every enterprise that is embracing new technology and includes not only health care providers but as well small and non-profit organizations:
* Will the technology of the future boost productivity?
* Can there be a positive protoblogr return from your the investment?
* Can the latest technology help improve the safety of patients?
If technology has been accepted then how can it be spread out or implemented?
These issues and concerns shouldn’t be a burden for only one individual. A team with an effective leader should assume the task. The team must employ an approach to problem solving that is formal like Plan-Do-Check-Act, to ensure the success. The first things the team must be able to determine is the reason why the technology should be implemented. It should define the objectives of the technology’s adoption. Maybe the technology is mandated by an accrediting agency or government agency. This is what happens with electronic prescriptions since CMS has mandated its use before the start of the year, or doctors are going to be punished. Another instance is that for my mechanic Arie Nol Auto Center; Arie Nol Auto Center is in the process of adopting modern technology to ensure that he can fix newer automobiles with a lot of electronic components that are computer-based, thereby staying competitive.
The technology shouldn’t be used if a convincing argument is not made to justify it. This is the strategy of Toyota Motor Systems, which first aims to maximize the efficiency of of its manufacturing processes that require humans before implementing any robot-based equipment in the floor. Utilizing this strategy, it has been able to maintain its high quality when compared with other automakers. In the year 2000, Consumers Reportsplaced Toyota as the first choice in either 6 or 10 the categories of automobiles.
If a group decides to take on a piece technology or software , it must first create a comprehensive plan of adoption. One of the components that should be included in the program is identifying of the measures that will be used to measure successful implementation. In the initial illustration I highlighted two factors how the technology can improve productivity, and increase the safety of patients? The AMA declared that it will however each facility should look beyond the research papers and evaluate their own progress with regard to implementation. Another factor that a group might want to consider is the level of satisfaction with customers or patients. Doctors who implement an EHR should examine the impact it has on patient satisfaction.
The next step is to develop the detailed plan for implementing the technology. The plan should include gathering information on the baseline for the metrics of success they have determined, a comprehensive list of the steps to be taken during implementation , and the selection of a person who will lead the process. For larger organizations or medical organizations, the process of implementation should concentrate on a first limited deployment of technology a small group who are eager to try it. This means that if it fails to achieve the goals it has set, then the failure is cost-effective. Imagine the expense for a business in the event that it doesn’t try initially and let the provider of the technology misleads the audience about the capability that the system can provide!
When implementing the technology, the project leader should constantly collect information on the actions which the group has determined. In this way, changes can be made to the project if needed or the project may be canceled if it can be observed that the project will be unsuccessful.
If the process goes smoothly The team should be happy about the accomplishment and plan how they can make the best usage of the new technology is being implemented as it introduces it to the entire company or website. The majority of new technologies are complex to implement fully. capabilities will take some time. In reality, a company or healthcare facility may not make use of all the capabilities of a gadget. For instance, I purchased an iPad2 a few months ago, and continue to learn about a few features it can offer to my company. I’m looking forward to learning even more in order to boost my efficiency.